If you have been searching about hair transplants, then you might encounter two techniques most. These are FUE and FUT. In general, most patients have a hard time deciding which technique is the better one for them.
If you are one of them, then the following information can be helpful for you. Both techniques can do wonders to help you to restore your hair. However, they also have their own advantages and disadvantages. Most of these also depend on your expectations, operation area, and preferences.
Which Transplant is Better: FUE or FUT?
It is impossible to say one of these techniques is better than the other. On the other hand, if we need to talk about statistics, then we would like to note that patients who favor the FUE method are 2.7% more than FUT.
FUE includes an approach that removes the hair follicles one by one. Thus, it offers a faster recovery and minimum scars. On the other hand, the operation takes longer and the number of hair that can be transplanted with this method is limited. Thus, it is ideal for small operation areas.
On the contrary, FUT includes an approach that removes hair follicles in strips. It offers a slightly longer recovery with visible scars that will go away as you recover. Unlike FUE, you can treat all kinds of baldness with FUT.
Which Transplant is Cheaper: FUE or FUT?
Due to the labor-intense nature of FUE, it is more expensive compared to the FUT technique. This operation requires more concentration and takes longer. Thus, naturally, FUT is a cheaper option among these two techniques. However, their overall cost may vary depending on many factors too.
